ASPIRATION for unchained participation in all walks of life is at the core of the spirit of Ekushey February, Martyr’s Day, observed on February 21 by the Bengalis, and now observed as International Mother Language Day throughout the world. Aspiration for unchained participation is the spirit peoples nourish transcending time and ages all around the world as it is part of the democratic way of life peoples aspire for around the globe. Ekushey’s spirit, thus, is democracy, universal.
Martyrs of Ekushey February, the February 21 Bangla language movement in 1952, and the role the people in East Bengal, now Bangladesh, played in the movement have vitalised the spirit. The movement was a duel between a people chained and a capital bent on imposing its demonic rule on the people in Bangladesh. And, the people emerged victorious.
Rulers in pre-1971 Pakistan were trying to keep the Bengali people in Poorba Bangla, East Bengal, disenfranchised to secure the interests of the capital the rulers represented. The plan to impose another language, Urdu, on the Bangla-speaking people in East Bengal was part of that ill-motive. But the capital concerned was not mature and powerful enough to impose its requirement on the people. The capital had to stumble. Ultimately, it had to make a retreat.
The Bengali people were different from the ‘foes’ the capital encountered in the Sindh, Sindhudesh to the Sindh nationalists, and Balochistan while the capital was also imposing its will on the peoples of those two regions in the western wing of the pre-1971 Pakistan. The Bengalis successfully handled the issue. A number of factors and forces — historical, ideological, social, economic, cultural, roles of classes and class alignment, political alienation and alignment, and these, in turn, reshaping mass psyche — brought the Bengalis’ success. The capital found itself in two opposite positions — it was having an upper hand in the Sindh and Balochistan while it was facing stiff and protracted resistance and losing ground in East Bengal. The equations the capital faced in the three regions — East Bengal, Sindh and Balochistan — varied, which is inherent in capital’s case.
Usually, it is said that the Ekushey movement mobilised the Bengalis as they had the apprehension that they would have been losers in areas of education, employment and other economic opportunities if Urdu had been imposed on them as the language was not vernacular. It was an immediate-possible scene in the areas of opportunity and entitlement.
A deeper sense other than the apprehension mentioned above was there among the Bengalis, however. There was a process of disenfranchising of the Bengalis the Pakistan rulers were pushing through a number of steps, beginning from the very first day of the Pakistan state. A closer look into the measures the state was taking and deliberations in the state’s legislative area bear the witnesses of the process of disenfranchising. The Bengalis began to perceive: a persistent process of disenfranchisement has been unleashed against them. The Bengalis attained the right to universal suffrage only after the mass uprising in 1969, after about a quarter of a century since the Pakistan state was formed by the colonial British rulers, and the Bengalis were made subservient to the state. Force, speed, spread and participation made the 1969-mass uprising unprecedented in Pakistan. The uprising toppled a dictator, nullified a ‘representative’ system undemocratic in essence and compelled a martial law rule to make compromises in a number of areas.
The de-languagization plan — imposing an alien language, restricting vernacular language and literature, distortion of vernacular language, characters and literature the Pakistan rulers were pushing through since they were enthroned in the new state — was part of the disenfranchisement design, which is essentially de-democratisation/robbing of all traces of democratic sphere. The Bengalis were resisting those evil designs. Moreover, economic and political struggles were carried out by different parts of the people despite reactionary onslaught on the people. Pro-people political forces took many initiatives to organise working people and members from the middle class and their struggles.
Scope for participation in political decision-making process narrows down/withers away with the de-democratisation/robbing of democratic sphere, and participation in political decision-making process is one of the elementary conditions for attaining equity and equality in the sphere of economy. ‘[P]olitical participation’, writes internationally renowned sociologist and political scientist Alessandro Pizzorno, ‘is a way of fighting against the inequalities of a certain society.’ (‘An introduction to the theory of political participation’, Information, vol 9, issue 5, October 1, 1970, International Social Science Council)
The Bengalis stood for their language, which was an essential requirement for creating a democratic sphere, especially for a people with a very low rate of literacy and a very low level of suffrage, with non-existent democratic political and local government institutions, with extremely low level of public and educational services, with no control over the management of public and educational institutions, resources and resource distribution systems as these institutions, systems and resources were fully controlled by the rulers and their orderlies at the local level.
Along with the state of affairs mentioned above, the level of political inequality was at its zenith. Related laws, rules, executive power, state of legislation process and local government, scope for accessing judiciary, and political incidents including incidents of political struggles by different parts of the people in East Bengal of the period carry evidences of the statement made above. (Related data and information are available in official and formal documents.)
Class power determines the level/pitch of political voice. Propertied classes are politically more organised, active and articulate in all stratified societies. Pakistan, and East Bengal, part of Pakistan at the period, was no exception. Dominated classes are least heard as the classes are systematically kept excluded from the mechanism of vocalising and hearing. De-languagization expands and strengthens the reality hostile to people.
‘Poor literacy […] limits a person’s ability to engage in activities that require […] critical thinking […]’, says the World Literacy Foundation. Such activities, according to the Foundation’s report, include ‘understanding government policies and voting in elections’, ‘interact with government agencies’, ‘calculating the cost and potential return of a financial investment’, ‘access up-to-date news and information’, ‘analysing sophisticated media and advertising messages….’ (The Economic and Social Cost of Illiteracy, A snapshot of illiteracy in a global context, August 24, 2015/September 2015) De-languagization does not help these activities, rather, spread of literacy faces obstacles with de-languagization, a part of de-democratisation.
The Bengalis’ struggle for their language — Bangla — on February 21, 1952, and throughout the years earlier and later — thus was an expression of aspiration for a democratic way of life, for democracy. A democracy ensures people’s participation in all walks of life, in decision making process, in ensuring transparency and accountability, and use of vernacular language in all walks of life facilitates and widens people’s participation in democratic process. Here lies people’s interest. Subduing vernacular language and/or negligence to it indicate(s) ‘something.’ The indication is related to power — economic and political — equation in society, to the state of propertied and dispossessed classes, to the force of capitalism transgressing countries’ borders. But it should not be confused that condition of vernacular language is the only indicator.
Ekushey, thus, was people’s struggle, common people’s struggle; people’s struggle with an aspiration for a democratic way of life. A democratic way of life is a life without muzzled voice and cowed down aspiration, without snatched away dreams and dignity, with equitable and equal opportunity to voice pains, demands, rejection, plans and questions, with equitable and equal opportunity to participate in all walks of life — political, economic, cultural, with no feeling of subdued and subjected, with full transparency and accountability in all aspects of public life. It is only people that can ensure this. Only people can ensure this with their politics and organisation. Ekushey would not have been successful without people’s participation. None and no organisation had the capability to make the movement successful without people’s participation. Ekushey’s spirit, thus, stands for people’s participation. Whatever is there obstructing people’s participation, whether it is capital’s force or force of political confusion and political unawareness, stands against the spirit of Ekushey.
Farooque Chowdhury is a Dhaka-based freelance writer.